The exchange of Slang does not impede the clarity of communication, nor is it an accurate identifier of one’s intelligence. I disagree with Isabelle Kerr’s article and her views on slang. I disagree with the article presented by Isabelle Kerr that is titled “Twerking, selfie and unlike? Young people don’t speak like that – I should know” Isabelle Kerr’s article rants about how great the old English language was and how more recent generations are destroying this artifactual tongue.

 

Kerr spends time in her article explaining her problems with the term ‘twerking’: “I actually had to Google this word.” Uh oh. In your great article on how bad and evil slang is, you actually used slang yourself. “Google” isn’t a real word, it is slang terminology for using the Google search engine, changing the Noun ‘Google’ into a verb. So how can this article even be valid if the person presenting it is showing clear signs of hypocrisy? Preposterous.

 

Isabelle Kerr uses stereotypes throughout her article to prove her point by labelling all “young people” as a group and then faulting the group as a whole. “It’s already a constant battle for young people to prove we’re not all apathetic, ASBO-wielding yobs who can’t communicate properly.” Excuse me? In this statement, you’re implying that most young people that utilise slang can’t communicate properly.

Properly: “adverb 1. correctly or satisfactorily.”

Communicate: ” verb 1. share or exchange information, news, or ideas.”

 

So how does slang impede the exchange of communication? Is there even a proper way to communicate? To communicate properly. To correctly share information. The method of that is completely opinion based.

 

“And I’m not alone. Some young Twitter users have expressed their rejection of the new words, with one young follower tweeting, ‘what has the world come to?’” Kerr seems to be implying that there is a constant battle for all young people to not be portrayed as the rest, is again, an act of hypocrisy. Throughout Kerr’s whole argument, she states that these slang words are a negative contribution to the English language. You also say that “your generation” only worries about image, reputation and sex and that the slang words are only used to portray such negative things. In reality, you are doing the same thing. You, alongside your young Twitter writers, are worrying about image and reputation by constantly trying to prove that you’re not like the “young people” which you seem to hate. So you’re going to rant about image and then obsess about image in an attempt to make yourself look like you’re not obsessing over your image. Where is the logic?

 

Kerr continues on to affirming, “Words like tweaking, unlike and selfie are nothing more than slang which, just like any fashion trend, come and go. After all, when was the last time you heard someone describe something as ‘groovy’?” The flare that set off your rant is the fact that slang words such as “unlike” have been added to the English dictionary. Then you’re using an example to support your argument through the word “groovy” not being used and that slang is a trend, is just dumb. Regardless of “groovy” being a trend, it has still been added to the dictionary as slang. This goes against your argument that although it being a trend, it has still been added to the dictionary, so why shouldn’t the other slang terms be added? Is it because the term “groovy” was invented before you were born that you have some sort of biased opinion when comparing modern day slang with older slang? Did you actually think that your generation created slang? Hahaha, don’t make me laugh. Slang has been around for as long or even longer than the English language has been in existence.

 

The article finishes with Kerr announcing that “Shakespeare will be turning in his grave.” Excuse me? Are you being serious? Are you so devoid of knowledge that you didn’t know that Shakespeare is considered an innovator of slang? How can you even use him in your argument? Well, you got one thing right. He is turning in his grave to come back and set your argument straight!

 

By Daniel Alvarado